Difference between revisions of "Qualification shows"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Major Faults: |
+ | '''Major Faults:''' |
(A single instance of any of the following issues constitutes a major fault:) |
(A single instance of any of the following issues constitutes a major fault:) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
- film snapping?? |
- film snapping?? |
||
| − | Minor Faults: |
+ | '''Minor Faults:''' |
(An instance of the following issues which is either left uncorrected for [insert length of time here] or which occurs persistently [observed X number of times] constitutes a minor fault:) |
(An instance of the following issues which is either left uncorrected for [insert length of time here] or which occurs persistently [observed X number of times] constitutes a minor fault:) |
||
Revision as of 17:21, 13 March 2007
Major Faults:
(A single instance of any of the following issues constitutes a major fault:)
- missing a C/O
- film snapping??
Minor Faults:
(An instance of the following issues which is either left uncorrected for [insert length of time here] or which occurs persistently [observed X number of times] constitutes a minor fault:)
- bad focusing
- bad racking (how severe?)
- sound failure
- shadows (aperture plate or tilt)
- picture instability
should unsuccessful attempts to fix the above minor faults be taken into account? For e.g. if the qualified projectionists present are satisfied that the best possible attempt was made to fix one of the above issues but that it just couldn't be resolved(e.g. the tilt wouldn't budge) then it should not be considered a fault?
