Difference between revisions of "Qualification shows"

From Warwick Student Cinema
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 4: Line 4:
   
 
missing a C/O
 
missing a C/O
  +
 
film snapping??
 
film snapping??
   
Line 11: Line 12:
   
 
bad focusing
 
bad focusing
  +
 
bad racking (how severe?)
 
bad racking (how severe?)
  +
 
sound failure
 
sound failure
  +
 
shadows (aperture plate or tilt)
 
shadows (aperture plate or tilt)
  +
 
picture instability
 
picture instability
   

Revision as of 17:21, 13 March 2007

Major Faults:

(A single instance of any of the following issues constitutes a major fault:)

missing a C/O

film snapping??

Minor Faults:

(An instance of the following issues which is either left uncorrected for [insert length of time here] or which occurs persistently [observed X number of times] constitutes a minor fault:)

bad focusing

bad racking (how severe?)

sound failure

shadows (aperture plate or tilt)

picture instability

should unsuccessful attempts to fix the above minor faults be taken into account? For e.g. if the qualified projectionists present are satisfied that the best possible attempt was made to fix one of the above issues but that it just couldn't be resolved(e.g. the tilt wouldn't budge) then it should not be considered a fault?