Difference between revisions of "Qualification shows"

From Warwick Student Cinema
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
{{ambox
  +
|type = notice
  +
|text = This page refers to 35mm Qualification Shows. Please ask a qualified projectionist for more information about Digital Qualification Shows. }}
  +
  +
{{ambox
  +
|type = style
  +
|text = Some or all of the information on this page is inconsistent, irrelevant or confusing.
  +
Please help clean it up if you are able. }}
  +
  +
A projectionist will "enjoy deferred success" in a qualification if they are guilty of committing [X number of] major and/or [X number of] minor faults during a single qualification show.
  +
  +
 
'''Major Faults:'''
 
'''Major Faults:'''
   
Line 21: Line 33:
 
- picture instability
 
- picture instability
   
  +
[[Category:Proj]]
 
'''
 
Other Comments'''
 
 
should unsuccessful attempts to fix the above minor faults be taken into account? For e.g. if the qualified projectionists present are satisfied that the best possible attempt was made to fix one of the above issues but that it just couldn't be resolved(e.g. the tilt wouldn't budge) then it should not be considered a fault?
 

Latest revision as of 19:31, 6 May 2019

A projectionist will "enjoy deferred success" in a qualification if they are guilty of committing [X number of] major and/or [X number of] minor faults during a single qualification show.


Major Faults:

(A single instance of any of the following issues constitutes a major fault:)

- missing a C/O

- film snapping??

Minor Faults:

(An instance of the following issues which is either left uncorrected for [insert length of time here] or which occurs persistently [observed X number of times] constitutes a minor fault:)

- bad focusing

- bad racking (how severe?)

- sound failure

- shadows (aperture plate or tilt)

- picture instability